Archive for September, 2009

2009
09.27

I am always telling everybody how much “I hate people,” but usually my reasoning is because “people are stupid.” It came to my attention that this is not really the best logic, so I took notes over the last few weeks why I hate people and came up with five reasons to hate people.

1. People don’t listen. I can’t begin to count how many times I’ve interacted with or worked with people that wouldn’t listen to me or my suggestions. I certainly have a tendency to get off topic in conversation, but often times when I have an idea or suggestion, nobody will listen to me. At multiple jobs, I have made suggestions directly relating to my duties and I was completely ignored by my supervisors. When I’m the one doing MY duties, wouldn’t I would be the one to observe how my job should be done better or how the firm can compete more efficiently in the field that I specialize in? Note: I would mention the companies and specific examples, but I do not want to ruin future opportunities for myself. Yet again, why would I want to work for someone that doesn’t listen to me?

2. People don’t tell you like it is. People really need to cut the bullshit. I don’t want fluff; tell me the way it is, whether it is good or bad. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen people make up stories and excuses to get out of meetings and/or tests. People just think it’s acceptable to lie through their teeth. One day it is going to bite them in the ass.

I once had a group project with one student, who told the group that he “was too busy” and wouldn’t be able to make the group meeting whenever we scheduled it. That was complete bullshit. The kid wouldn’t make time for the group project because he was too busy doing other things. If you don’t care about something, say so. If you have a problem with something, don’t sit on your ass and do nothing. Get up and do something about it.

3. People are not reliable. When I say I am going to do something, I actually plan on doing it. Not only do I plan on doing it, but I plan on making sure that “it” is done to the highest standards. This is not often the case with other people, as few actually follow through. People say they are going to do something and then they either never actually do it or they just half-ass it. It’s called integrity, people! I have seen students blow off meetings, events and projects after ensuring they were going to participate. In a world of corrupt, lying politicians and unethical business people, I would be willing to pay a premium to work with people that follow through with what comes out of their mouth. If I honor my promises, why can’t everybody else?

4. People waste time. As a college student, my time is my most valuable asset. I can spend my time working and making money or I can spend it studying and getting good grades. My time is valuable! Sure I’m not making hundreds of dollars an hour, but I am creating the potential to do so in the future. I once had somebody Facebook message me and ask me if I was interested in making money. If so, she wanted my phone number so her boss could call me, as she was in training. I asked her what company it was for; she wouldn’t tell me. I did not give her my number. Had I actually given her my number, I am sure my time would have been wasted by a phone call from a student working for Cutco.

5. People do not accept change. In a changing economic landscape, the workplace and classroom are changing at a rate never seen before. There are new policies and technologies being implemented everywhere. In other words everything is changing. I understand that it is human’s first nature to resist change, but in a technologically infused service economy, one must embrace change or they will be left in the dust. I have heard people claim that “technology is not my thing.” The problem with that claim is that if innovative technology is at the forefront of education and the economy and you don’t follow or at least keep up to date with the innovative technology, people are going to buy other people’s services, not yours. Change is inevitable and if you don’t embrace it, you will probably not go much further career-wise. In fact, your potential will decrease if you continue with your antiquated ways.

Along with my list, here is my favorite list people should abide by, both in and out of the work place.

Edit: I don’t actually hate people. In fact, I love people. I have high expectations for people I interact with and more often than not, they disappoint me. I have high standards and I will never lower them.

2009
09.24

So I’ve had a Google voice number for a few months now. At first I thought, wow, this is an interesting concept, but where am I actually going to use it? I played with it here and there, but nothing too major. I noted that there was one huge feature that was missing, “forward texts to email.”

After a few months, I just started really getting into Google voice today. That got me thinking, so I sent an email to one of my more technically inclined friends. No wonder why Apple and their partner in crime, AT&T, blocked Google voice from the iPhone; it really is that big of a market disruption. But writing about those criminals is a post for another time.

Here is the email of thoughts that I wrote to my friend exactly as I sent it. Please excuse my shitty grammar/punctuation/flow.

“When I text somebody with google voice through and they text me back from their google voice, it appears to my phone that it is from their google voice #.

If i text somebody who doesnt have google voice and they text me back it appears from a 406-xxx-xxxx number. but if i text back that unique number, it goes to that person. So therefore google is technically assigning everybody who i text an arbitrary 406-xxx-xxxx number. At that rate there is a technical limit that exists of a little less than 8 million different different people that can text me. (that is assuming google doesnt have another area code assigned to them, probably by the fcc.)

So if I was to save each of the ppl that text me’s individual 406 number than i should just be able to text that number rather than having to go through google voice app on my bb, correct?

I actually just tried calling the 406 number assigned to my roommate’s cell by google and it went through to his phone. So the question at hand is, do i delete everybody’s cell #s in my phone and just save their arbitrary google voice 406 number to have my phone act as if it was completely run by google?

It appears to me that google has all of these numbers to use and for my arbitrary number for my roommate would be a different arbitrary number than if you were to contact him through your google voice #.

yet again, do i really trust google with all of my numbers and essentially my life?”

After thinking things through further, I asked myself, “why doesn’t Google just give me the list of arbitrary 406 area code phone numbers of my contacts. Better yet, why don’t they import it into my contacts/address book for me? It would probably make me and tons of other people more likely to switch fully to their product. I’ll have to suggest it to them in the beta comments/suggestions form.

Edit: if you save that arbitrary 406# and go to text that 406 # from the google voice web interface, it wont go through, it will only work with the 406# if you text it from your phone, which is stupid because it is basically sending a text to that 406 # from your secondary number, which google knows is yours, but it wont go through with googles servers to the arbitrary #406 number assigned to your contacts

Edit #2: After playing with google voice for a while, I noticed that it would be awesome if the web interface updated live, like gmail does. MMS support would also be nice. I wouldn’t care if the MMS storage space came out of my allotted Gmail space.

2009
09.23

Be jealous…

2009
09.22



2009
09.13

I currently use an e-book for my microeconomic theory class. It is an e-book pilot; the publisher gave us an email address if we have any comments, suggestions or concerns. I wrote them an email with my observations after using the book for about three weeks:

To whom it may concern,

My name is Jared Kastriner and I am a participant in the UT e-book pilot. The book I am currently using is Besanko-Microeconomics. I am writing in regards to some of the issues that I have encountered with the e-book. (Please keep in mind that this is my first e-book and I have nothing to compare it to.)

The first and biggest issue of all is that the e-book is simply just the equivalent of a PDF of the actual book. That type of formatting cannot be read by a user. It has boxes of text in the middle of nowhere and columns, which make it difficult for continuous reading. Think about the New York Times website, they don’t just upload a PDF of the newspaper, they format it so it is computer-screen friendly. They put their text boxes to the side, so the main content is readable and the reader can go back to the textbox when they get to a stopping point. Sure uploading a PDF to the online book store saved you a significant amount of money, but there is little to no point of you having an e-book if it is not a desirable good whatsoever.

The next issue that I noted is that the text of the book does not link to other parts of the book. When you refer to graphic 2.xxx, have the text actually link to the graphic. The same thing applies for each individual chapter index. When you say we are going to be talking about “blahblahblah” in chapter 5.4, link to chapter 5.4. I don’t want to have to actually search the entire e-book, when Wiley knows where it is, and they just are not telling me. The same issue should apply to key words, when there is a significant key word, make it a hyperlink and link it to the glossary in the back of the book. I shouldn’t have to scroll all the way down to the end of the book to find what a key word means. Much like I could click a hyperlink to bring me to the glossary definition, there should also be a button in the interface that allows me to go back to where I was before I went to the glossary.

My last issue with the e-book is that it is saved on the user’s computer, which to me seems like Wiley is not very knowledgeable of cloud computing. Everybody at a university has access to the internet somehow, so it would not be very web 3.0 to keep the user’s book on their home computer. By keeping the user’s individual copy of the book on your server, the user can now access their book wherever they go, with all of their notes and highlighted sections. This would be a true convenience for the student because then we don’t have the worry about bringing out laptop if we go home or go away. The cost to you would be both minimal and beneficial. The price of storing data and bandwidth are dropping exponentially so it would cost Wiley close to nothing to store it on its web servers. Also keep in mind that by making your e-book web based, you conveniently do not have to worry about supporting all the different types of computers (mac, pc, linux, etc), you just have to worry about supporting the browser. You’re probably going to say what if the user goes off line, then you implement something similar to Gmail for desktop, where all the emails are saved on the user’s computer and are updated every time they connect to the internet.

In no way did I mean to bash email Wiley in this email; I only mean to participate in all aspects of the pilot. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to shoot me an email or give me a call at (516)- (number redacted).

I am also posting this email on my blog, not to show that I am awesome for calling Wiley out, but to show my analysis on the business and technological aspects of the e-book. If you would like, I would be glad to post your response as well below my letter.

Regards,

Jared Kastriner